Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14771 - 14780 of 64995 for or b.

State v. John London Bradshaw
to §§ 161.16(2)(b)(1), 161.41(1m)(cm)(2), 161.48 and 941.29(2), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11676 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert M. Madden
of robbery and two counts of armed robbery contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(a), 943.32(1)(b) and 943.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15786 - 2017-09-21

State v. Patricia A. P.
containing the notice required by s. 48.356(2). (b) That the agency responsible for the care of the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8978 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Johnnie A. Trotter
, 409-10, 469 N.W.2d 871 (Ct. App. 1991). B. The trial court lacked the statutory power to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5331 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 46
. 4 Two scenarios are presented in WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4)(b): where the defendant claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), second offense. Burch argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68299 - 2011-07-20

[PDF] State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
)(a)&(b)&(2), 939.641(2), 939.31, 939.05, and 939.32, STATS. Beyah raises two issues: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10431 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Terry Thomas Trepanier
). (b) The court required the person to provide a biological specimen under s. 973.047(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10460 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Christina Bellon v. Ripon College
on the briefs of Tamara B. Packard and Lester A. Pines of Cullen, Weston, Pines & Bach, LLP, Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7330 - 2017-09-20

Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
mechanism for this deduction. See § 71.04(9)(b), Stats. (1985–86).[2] The federal tax-law provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31