Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14771 - 14780 of 91465 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 14771 - 14780 of 91465 for police arresting judge 2 part.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and cause remanded for further proceedings. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114859 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and cause remanded for further proceedings. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Blanchard, P.J., Fitzpatrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628619 - 2023-03-02
, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. Before Blanchard, P.J., Fitzpatrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628619 - 2023-03-02
State v. Debra Ann Head
, 2000 JUDGES: Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ Concurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16235 - 2005-03-31
, 2000 JUDGES: Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ Concurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16235 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
to 1 This is a one-judge appeal pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(g) (2001-02). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
to 1 This is a one-judge appeal pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(g) (2001-02). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6651 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Edward A. Stoetzel
, Gaffney had no information from which to judge Strong's credibility as a knowing and voluntary police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10830 - 2017-09-20
, Gaffney had no information from which to judge Strong's credibility as a knowing and voluntary police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10830 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be decided by a three-judge panel. See WIS. STAT. § 752.31(1)-(2). We therefore deny Mary’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062401 - 2026-01-13
to be decided by a three-judge panel. See WIS. STAT. § 752.31(1)-(2). We therefore deny Mary’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062401 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be decided by a three-judge panel. See WIS. STAT. § 752.31(1)-(2). We therefore deny Mary’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062400 - 2026-01-13
to be decided by a three-judge panel. See WIS. STAT. § 752.31(1)-(2). We therefore deny Mary’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062400 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: BENJAMIN D. PROCTOR, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: BENJAMIN D. PROCTOR, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
County: mark l. goodman, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, Sherman and Blanchard, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90901 - 2012-12-20
County: mark l. goodman, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, Sherman and Blanchard, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90901 - 2012-12-20
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
to the exclusionary rule applies where the police obtained a search warrant in good faith – although based, in part
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117308 - 2017-09-21
to the exclusionary rule applies where the police obtained a search warrant in good faith – although based, in part
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117308 - 2017-09-21