Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14781 - 14790 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14781 - 14790 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
State v. Arthur B. Patton
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶5, 295 Wis. 2d 627, 721 N.W.2d 153. The methodology and standards establishing our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2005-03-31
, ¶5, 295 Wis. 2d 627, 721 N.W.2d 153. The methodology and standards establishing our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven T. Moore
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17853 - 2005-04-26
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17853 - 2005-04-26
Janice M. Eilola v. Linda Hattlestad
the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Capitol Indem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15254 - 2005-03-31
the facts satisfy a legal standard presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Capitol Indem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15254 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the determination of reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40560 - 2009-09-08
. However, the determination of reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40560 - 2009-09-08
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
James L. Stocking v. Cynthia M. Stocking
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Novak v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 133, 136, 515
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4374 - 2005-03-31
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Novak v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 133, 136, 515
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4374 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 226
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., 2004 WI 93, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30363 - 2007-10-30
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., 2004 WI 93, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30363 - 2007-10-30
Danny Prince Hall v. Gerald Berge
. On certiorari, we review the prison disciplinary committee’s decision de novo and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13510 - 2005-03-31
. On certiorari, we review the prison disciplinary committee’s decision de novo and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13510 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional fact which we review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶6 Coleman argues two issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2005-11-01
is a constitutional fact which we review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶6 Coleman argues two issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2005-11-01