Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14781 - 14790 of 65866 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14781 - 14790 of 65866 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Babette Davis
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Terry R.H.
individual's treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11338 - 2017-09-19
individual's treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11338 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138449 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138449 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the reason on the record.” Section 973.20(1r). “Crime considered at sentencing” is defined as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
the reason on the record.” Section 973.20(1r). “Crime considered at sentencing” is defined as “any crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102338 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29
State v. Timothy A. Hellman
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record, counsel’s report, and Myers’ response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-24
2 record, counsel’s report, and Myers’ response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-24