Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14791 - 14800 of 65879 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14791 - 14800 of 65879 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
consecutively to a current sentence that he was serving. Because the record as a whole demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
consecutively to a current sentence that he was serving. Because the record as a whole demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1741-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901381 - 2025-01-16
. No. 2023AP1741-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901381 - 2025-01-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319544 - 2020-12-30
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319544 - 2020-12-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171603 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Dearing’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237640 - 2019-03-20
2 response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Dearing’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237640 - 2019-03-20
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as No. 2017AP1514-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206850 - 2018-01-09
of the record as No. 2017AP1514-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206850 - 2018-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146239 - 2017-09-21
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146239 - 2017-09-21
State v. Babette Davis
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31