Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14791 - 14800 of 20937 for word.

State v. Evans A. W.
are mindful that, unlike in the case of a jury’s one-word verdict, we have the benefit of the fact finder’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3087 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 364, 394 N.W.2d 909 (Ct. App. 1986). In other words, “the State may not accomplish through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the way,” which the witness understood to mean “kill him” even though Harris never used the word “kill
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787980 - 2024-04-11

[PDF] State v. Harris D. Byers
distributively, so that each word is applied to the subject or consequent that most properly relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2273 - 2017-09-19

Lawrence D. Ledman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
would have understood the words of the contract to mean.” Id. at 90-91, 540 N.W.2d at 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13567 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
matter, they should be read together. When read together, the Department asserts, the word “department
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21

State v. William F. Hughes
if the court had the correct information. In other words, the court may have considered the inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14058 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel Rodriguez
the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.’” Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 748 (1984) (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3047 - 2005-03-31

Michael B. Sandy v.
in Wisconsin, which account shall be clearly designated as “Client’s Account” or “Trust Account” or words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17223 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terry A. Apel
think an emergency existed. Id. at 450-51. In other words, the officer must subjectively observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3219 - 2005-03-31