Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 16451 for commenting.

[PDF] Rule Order
conference on September 12, 2013, and voted unanimously to solicit written comments and then discuss
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115257 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2021AP001450 - Response of Hunter Intervenors to Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz
. ......................................................... 10 A. Movants misrepresent Justice Protasiewicz’s campaign comments regarding Wisconsin’s
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020524hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-02-06

[PDF] State v. Warren Goodman
the following limited comments regarding Sallis: Now Percy Sallis was found two years after this offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14600 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and the prosecutor’s comment. For the following reasons, we affirm. ¶3 These background facts provide context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213962 - 2018-06-12

[PDF]
of this appeal. The court commented that it was “unusual” for a defendant to be insisting on his innocence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917568 - 2025-02-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the prosecutor’s improper comments in closing argument. Therefore, we affirm Roger’s conviction. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209058 - 2018-03-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
,” “was the same.” Schneiter testified that comments to his posts would have reflected his intent and shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974955 - 2025-06-26

[PDF] State v. Brian C. Wulff
-CR -2- prosecutor's comment on his refusal to answer police questions denied him due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9256 - 2017-09-19

State v. Brian C. Wulff
deliberations prejudiced his defense; (3) the prosecutor's comment on his refusal to answer police questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9256 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
or submitted written comments. The court further discussed the matter, including additional written comments
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33578 - 2014-09-15