Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 68892 for he.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 68892 for he.
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
, Luedtke was released on parole. One of the conditions of Luedtke’s parole was that he not “possess, own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
, Luedtke was released on parole. One of the conditions of Luedtke’s parole was that he not “possess, own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Travis S. Olson
was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal request for an attorney, there was no violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4068 - 2017-09-20
was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal request for an attorney, there was no violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4068 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a witness. He asserts there is insufficient evidence to support the verdicts. We reject his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
a witness. He asserts there is insufficient evidence to support the verdicts. We reject his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
, Luedtke was released on parole. One of the conditions of Luedtke’s parole was that he not “possess, own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
, Luedtke was released on parole. One of the conditions of Luedtke’s parole was that he not “possess, own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
witness was Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Goth, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51335 - 2014-09-15
witness was Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Goth, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51335 - 2014-09-15
State v. Travis S. Olson
to police. The State argues that because Olson was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-03-31
to police. The State argues that because Olson was not in custody and because he never made an unequivocal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. He claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress because he believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31409 - 2008-01-08
trial. He claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress because he believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31409 - 2008-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition in this court, which asserts the same arguments he makes in his briefs. Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18
for summary disposition in this court, which asserts the same arguments he makes in his briefs. Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition in this court, which asserts the same arguments he makes in his briefs. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18
for summary disposition in this court, which asserts the same arguments he makes in his briefs. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he came upon a running vehicle sitting by the side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2015-07-06
, the arresting officer. Goth testified that at 12:37 a.m. he came upon a running vehicle sitting by the side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2015-07-06