Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 69415 for he.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 69415 for he.
CA Blank Order
to ascertain that the defendant understands the elements of the crimes to which he is pleading guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147176 - 2015-08-23
to ascertain that the defendant understands the elements of the crimes to which he is pleading guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147176 - 2015-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in admitting both statements he gave to the police because they were not voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31123 - 2007-08-19
court erred in admitting both statements he gave to the police because they were not voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31123 - 2007-08-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
Attorney Backes' objection, he should be required to pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20018 - 2010-02-01
Attorney Backes' objection, he should be required to pay the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20018 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448003 - 2021-11-02
, and an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448003 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
State v. Frank M. Ruszkiewicz
raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15485 - 2017-09-21
raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15485 - 2017-09-21
State v. Frank M. Ruszkiewicz
Ruszkiewicz raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
Ruszkiewicz raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arden C. Hirsch
was “conduct imminently dangerous to another” or that his conduct “evinced a depraved mind.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3466 - 2017-09-20
was “conduct imminently dangerous to another” or that his conduct “evinced a depraved mind.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3466 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony; (2) he suffered a violation of his sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294209 - 2020-10-06
testimony; (2) he suffered a violation of his sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294209 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his no-contest plea. Al Bawi argues that he must be permitted to withdraw his plea because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611949 - 2023-01-18
his no-contest plea. Al Bawi argues that he must be permitted to withdraw his plea because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611949 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County failed to introduce clear and convincing evidence to support the conclusion that he is dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092470 - 2026-03-18
County failed to introduce clear and convincing evidence to support the conclusion that he is dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092470 - 2026-03-18