Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 12460 for mr.
Search results 1481 - 1490 of 12460 for mr.
CA Blank Order
“[h]e did not request it nor did I have any belief that Mr. Booker did not fully understand what
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18
“[h]e did not request it nor did I have any belief that Mr. Booker did not fully understand what
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
State v. John Allen
constitutes a waiver of the issue, Mr. Toliver requests resentencing on the grounds that he was denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16673 - 2017-09-21
constitutes a waiver of the issue, Mr. Toliver requests resentencing on the grounds that he was denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16673 - 2017-09-21
State v. William J. Church
reason for increasing the sentence on the sexual assault conviction:[6] I do note that Mr. Church has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4612 - 2005-03-31
reason for increasing the sentence on the sexual assault conviction:[6] I do note that Mr. Church has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4612 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William J. Church
the sentence on the sexual assault conviction: 6 I do note that Mr. Church has been an exemplary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4612 - 2017-09-19
the sentence on the sexual assault conviction: 6 I do note that Mr. Church has been an exemplary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4612 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David G. Alexander
. The officer identified the driver as the defendant, Mr. David G. Alexander. In response to Officer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17134 - 2017-09-21
. The officer identified the driver as the defendant, Mr. David G. Alexander. In response to Officer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17134 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Hudson
thereafter, Hudson’s counsel said, “I believe Mr. Hudson will want to retain other counsel, but I didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13703 - 2014-09-15
thereafter, Hudson’s counsel said, “I believe Mr. Hudson will want to retain other counsel, but I didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13703 - 2014-09-15
Mark Vanderbeke v. Jeffrey Endicott
, the following exchange took place: [Vanderbeke's counsel]: Good afternoon, Mr. Vanderbeke. Mr. Vanderbeke
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17002 - 2005-03-31
, the following exchange took place: [Vanderbeke's counsel]: Good afternoon, Mr. Vanderbeke. Mr. Vanderbeke
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17002 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
? A He said—Mr. Peaslee said that he was driving. Q So he admitted that he was the driver? A He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45985 - 2014-09-15
? A He said—Mr. Peaslee said that he was driving. Q So he admitted that he was the driver? A He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45985 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court observed: Candidly, it’s hard to take Mr. Polich entirely at his word on whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118785 - 2014-09-15
, the circuit court observed: Candidly, it’s hard to take Mr. Polich entirely at his word on whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Vanderbeke v. Jeffrey Endicott
took place: [Vanderbeke's counsel]: Good afternoon, Mr. Vanderbeke. Mr. Vanderbeke: He's fired
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17002 - 2017-09-21
took place: [Vanderbeke's counsel]: Good afternoon, Mr. Vanderbeke. Mr. Vanderbeke: He's fired
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17002 - 2017-09-21