Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14801 - 14810 of 30165 for consulta de causas.

2007 WI APP 135
of law this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28578 - 2007-07-11

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26907 - 2006-10-24

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G., 2007 WI 77, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55216 - 2010-10-06

Rick Keiting v. Mike Skauge
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9529 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01

State v. David R. Messner
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need not consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15622 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to the constitutional principles is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶12 The colloquy is intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
pass constitutional muster is a question of law we review de novo.” Oswald, 232 Wis. 2d 103, ¶42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29903 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Reprographics, Inc., 203 Wis. 2d 226, 238, 552 N.W.2d 440 (Ct. App. 1996) (we review de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144452 - 2015-07-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of this case meet this definition is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Trochinski, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22