Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 29769 for des.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 29769 for des.
State v. Brian W. Sprang
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. A breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6786 - 2005-03-31
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. A breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6786 - 2005-03-31
State v. Francis D. Warrichaiet
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 177. The State must show, beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7367 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 177. The State must show, beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. “A determination of dangerousness [in the context of a ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329473 - 2021-01-28
of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. “A determination of dangerousness [in the context of a ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329473 - 2021-01-28
State v. Jeffrey R. Groth
instruction violated a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4574 - 2005-03-31
instruction violated a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4574 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosemary E. Heintz v. Leonard Heintz
the trial court applied the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14997 - 2017-09-21
the trial court applied the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct constituted ineffective assistance is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶18 J.K. alleges two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781713 - 2024-03-28
conduct constituted ineffective assistance is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶18 J.K. alleges two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781713 - 2024-03-28
State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
The construction of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14713 - 2005-03-31
The construction of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 5
); WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106034 - 2017-09-21
); WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” By contrast, appellate courts review de novo a trial court’s conclusions of law—even if the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913851 - 2025-02-12
.” By contrast, appellate courts review de novo a trial court’s conclusions of law—even if the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913851 - 2025-02-12
Denis Collins v. Andrew Policano
before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15063 - 2005-03-31
before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15063 - 2005-03-31