Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 50108 for our.

[PDF] NOTICE
16, 673 N.W.2d 65. ¶8 Our review involves a three-step process. Id., ¶24. First, we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35676 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Eddie D. Cannon v. State
. The briefs imply that this appeal arises from a trial court order entered following our remand in Cannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8639 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
is to determine our standard of review. At bottom, the issue is whether the officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34728 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to confrontation. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2019AP1178-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
supervision, our review would have been limited to the sentence after revocation and not the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81735 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and protective placement orders. R. H. has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170346 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dawn C. Moline
. We each came to the decision conference having each conducted our own independent construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14527 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103479 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP933-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Jordan’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515422 - 2022-05-04