Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 50107 for our.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 50107 for our.
CA Blank Order
this court had jurisdiction over the appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93182 - 2013-02-18
this court had jurisdiction over the appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93182 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656059 - 2023-05-16
. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656059 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
motion for sentence modification.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2012AP2595 2 conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2012AP2595 2 conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judicial consideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184116 - 2017-09-21
judicial consideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the issues he raised in his 2009 motion were not raised previously. As our supreme court has stated, “[w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59466 - 2014-09-15
the issues he raised in his 2009 motion were not raised previously. As our supreme court has stated, “[w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59466 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denied his motions and this appeal follows. ¶5 Our review of sentencing decisions is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
denied his motions and this appeal follows. ¶5 Our review of sentencing decisions is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
underlying our decision in Covington III is therefore “void” and should be vacated pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
underlying our decision in Covington III is therefore “void” and should be vacated pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
COURT OF APPEALS
is to determine our standard of review. At bottom, the issue is whether the officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34728 - 2008-12-02
is to determine our standard of review. At bottom, the issue is whether the officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34728 - 2008-12-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2011AP2911-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93817 - 2014-09-15
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2011AP2911-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93817 - 2014-09-15