Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 59386 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 59386 for quit claim deed.
Curran v. Jeannine Pemberton
a judgment dismissing its small claims action against Jeannine Pemberton and Charles Paulman without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13170 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing its small claims action against Jeannine Pemberton and Charles Paulman without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vances H. Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and underlying Eighth Amendment claims. Smith argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10292 - 2017-09-20
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and underlying Eighth Amendment claims. Smith argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10292 - 2017-09-20
Caren C. v. Robin M.
the termination of his parental rights on the basis that there was insufficient evidence to support the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3699 - 2005-03-31
the termination of his parental rights on the basis that there was insufficient evidence to support the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3699 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sveum
motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98).1 He claims that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21
motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98).1 He claims that the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed by a Michigan judgment against Justin. The Mendenhalls claim issue preclusion bars EduCap from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190957 - 2017-09-21
imposed by a Michigan judgment against Justin. The Mendenhalls claim issue preclusion bars EduCap from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190957 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy S. Moen
, Moen claims that his written statement was coerced, that his car was illegally searched, and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13038 - 2005-03-31
, Moen claims that his written statement was coerced, that his car was illegally searched, and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13038 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Sveum
appeals the denial of his postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1997-98).[1] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31
appeals the denial of his postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1997-98).[1] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and a supplemental no-merit report asserting that any potential claim for relief would lack arguable merit. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
and a supplemental no-merit report asserting that any potential claim for relief would lack arguable merit. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and a supplemental no-merit report asserting that any potential claim for relief would lack arguable merit. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
and a supplemental no-merit report asserting that any potential claim for relief would lack arguable merit. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
Shane C. Brickner v. Continental Casualty Company
. Larson and Brickner claim that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10644 - 2005-03-31
. Larson and Brickner claim that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10644 - 2005-03-31