Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 14821 - 14830 of 64013 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
810, 676 N.W.2d 500 (after appointed counsel has reviewed the transcript and record, counsel must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93281 - 2008-03-17
810, 676 N.W.2d 500 (after appointed counsel has reviewed the transcript and record, counsel must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93281 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
unsupported by the facts apparently in the record.’” State v. Garfoot, 207 Wis. 2d 214, 224, 558 N.W.2d 626
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106614 - 2014-01-13
unsupported by the facts apparently in the record.’” State v. Garfoot, 207 Wis. 2d 214, 224, 558 N.W.2d 626
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106614 - 2014-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial. We conclude that the evidence in the record supports the trial court’s decision, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07
to trial. We conclude that the evidence in the record supports the trial court’s decision, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07
State v. Timothy J. Jeske
nature of the crime; the record of past criminal offenses; any history of undesirable behavior patterns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20425 - 2006-11-13
nature of the crime; the record of past criminal offenses; any history of undesirable behavior patterns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20425 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and response, as well as our independent review of the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
report and response, as well as our independent review of the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record and 1 This appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076411 - 2026-02-11
. After reviewing the record and 1 This appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076411 - 2026-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
when it polled the jury after the verdict was read. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
when it polled the jury after the verdict was read. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, and he has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081430 - 2026-02-25
a response, and he has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081430 - 2026-02-25
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93169 - 2013-02-18
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93169 - 2013-02-18
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123241 - 2014-10-01
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123241 - 2014-10-01