Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14831 - 14840 of 25792 for bench warrant/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not constitute a “new factor” warranting further sentencing proceedings. ¶17 Leiser also asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98604 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
designation, was not warranted. ¶13 Myra moved for reconsideration, and in a written decision denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142990 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph E. Newton
outstanding warrants for Newton’s arrest. At the time, Newton was sitting in the driver’s seat of a car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3887 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the hypothesis that she did not know that she possessed cocaine is sufficiently reasonable to warrant reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138979 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Pao V.
police officers searched the automobile of a woman who had been arrested for an outstanding warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15806 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. See id. We will uphold the circuit court’s discretionary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188796 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the case and warranted the forfeiture of counsel. Compulsory Process to Secure Witnesses ¶20 The Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68300 - 2011-07-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
had shown a new factor, sentence modification was not warranted in light of all the other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739483 - 2023-12-13

[PDF] Lynn Boxhorn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
and warrants a new trial in the interest of justice. Boxhorn cross-appeals, claiming that because of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7873 - 2017-09-19

Cheryl Jean Swetlik v. William Philip Swetlik
of child support is subject to modification if future circumstances warrant revision. Johnson v. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3608 - 2005-03-31