Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 68485 for did.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 68485 for did.
State v. Lance L. Egner
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7158 - 2005-03-31
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Joseph Kovach
%. The applicable prohibited alcohol concentration was .08%. See WIS. STAT. § 340.01(46m)(a). Kovach did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25460 - 2017-09-21
%. The applicable prohibited alcohol concentration was .08%. See WIS. STAT. § 340.01(46m)(a). Kovach did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25460 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lance L. Egner
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7159 - 2005-03-31
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it heard arguments on the motion. The court noted that the motion did not cite authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
it heard arguments on the motion. The court noted that the motion did not cite authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allowed Diaz to testify about Kaurala’s report because Diaz did not perform the DNA analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87370 - 2014-09-15
allowed Diaz to testify about Kaurala’s report because Diaz did not perform the DNA analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87370 - 2014-09-15
Bharati Holtzman v. Jon E. Holtzman
. ¶4 Jon argues that the circuit court did not have authority to make a decision regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25867 - 2006-07-12
. ¶4 Jon argues that the circuit court did not have authority to make a decision regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25867 - 2006-07-12
State v. Jurgen Brinkman
” is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Brinkman argued that he did not violate § 944.30(1) because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
” is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Brinkman argued that he did not violate § 944.30(1) because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and for resentencing based on accurate & true information.” Although the motion did not identify itself as one under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177075 - 2017-09-21
and for resentencing based on accurate & true information.” Although the motion did not identify itself as one under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177075 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carlos Facundo
of the cocaine for his own use. As reprehensible as this behavior was, however, we conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31
of the cocaine for his own use. As reprehensible as this behavior was, however, we conclude that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31
Debbra MacDonald v. American National Property and Casualty Company
question and answer: Q: When you were working in Door County did you have any - did you ever have any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2382 - 2005-03-31
question and answer: Q: When you were working in Door County did you have any - did you ever have any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2382 - 2005-03-31