Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 17241 for probate/1000.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 17241 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the 139 days at issue in this case. Yanick involves the revocation of probation and addressed the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32922 - 2014-09-15
for the 139 days at issue in this case. Yanick involves the revocation of probation and addressed the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32922 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in favor of consecutive twenty years’ probation. A postconviction motion was denied, and LaSchum now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56807 - 2010-11-17
in favor of consecutive twenty years’ probation. A postconviction motion was denied, and LaSchum now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56807 - 2010-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions, the court withheld sentence and imposed two years’ probation on each count concurrent to each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397478 - 2021-07-27
convictions, the court withheld sentence and imposed two years’ probation on each count concurrent to each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397478 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violated a no-contact order with M.K. while on probation for a domestic violence altercation between them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206177 - 2017-12-27
violated a no-contact order with M.K. while on probation for a domestic violence altercation between them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206177 - 2017-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution obligations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94791 - 2013-04-01
order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution obligations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94791 - 2013-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of sentence credit for the 139 days at issue in this case. Yanick involves the revocation of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32922 - 2008-06-09
of sentence credit for the 139 days at issue in this case. Yanick involves the revocation of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32922 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consider the least restrictive setting for Robinson’s needs, but probation was not warranted in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207489 - 2018-01-22
consider the least restrictive setting for Robinson’s needs, but probation was not warranted in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207489 - 2018-01-22
State v. Joseph C. Coles
. At the sentencing hearing, Coles requested that the trial court place him on probation. The trial court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10346 - 2005-03-31
. At the sentencing hearing, Coles requested that the trial court place him on probation. The trial court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Guy N. Giese
the conviction. The final claim is that the ten-year prison term and consecutive ten- year probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
the conviction. The final claim is that the ten-year prison term and consecutive ten- year probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-3600 Susan Lutz Register in Probate Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357607 - 2021-04-20
-3600 Susan Lutz Register in Probate Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357607 - 2021-04-20