Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and sentences.2 He argued that the reason that he did not raise his claims earlier was that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
and sentences.2 He argued that the reason that he did not raise his claims earlier was that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Schmidt moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that Keyes and Hegna’s breach-of- contract claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739106 - 2023-12-13
. Schmidt moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that Keyes and Hegna’s breach-of- contract claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739106 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim was also procedurally barred by Escalona. ¶4 Preliminarily, Parker waived his Batson challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49298 - 2014-09-15
claim was also procedurally barred by Escalona. ¶4 Preliminarily, Parker waived his Batson challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49298 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
a restitution order. He claims the restitution order should have been extinguished when his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14957 - 2005-03-31
a restitution order. He claims the restitution order should have been extinguished when his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14957 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
a restitution order. He claims the restitution order should have been extinguished when his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14958 - 2005-03-31
a restitution order. He claims the restitution order should have been extinguished when his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14958 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
action had been filed.[2] The court rejected Ronald’s claim that he transferred the vehicle to Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08
action had been filed.[2] The court rejected Ronald’s claim that he transferred the vehicle to Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08
State v. Armond N. Henderson
contends the trial court erred in ruling that his claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11
contends the trial court erred in ruling that his claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment claim because he failed to object during the trial. Id., ¶23. On review, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
Amendment claim because he failed to object during the trial. Id., ¶23. On review, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
State v. Timothy A. Powell
denying postconviction relief. Powell claims his sentence should be “restructured.” Powell also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21498 - 2006-02-21
denying postconviction relief. Powell claims his sentence should be “restructured.” Powell also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21498 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
Louie E. Aiello v. Gary R. McCaughtry
U.S.C. § 1983 action against various prison officials. They claim Green was No. 94-1466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7904 - 2017-09-19
U.S.C. § 1983 action against various prison officials. They claim Green was No. 94-1466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7904 - 2017-09-19