Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14841 - 14850 of 59865 for richard riley divorce attorney.

Todd E. Lange v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12265 - 2005-03-31

State v. Obea S. Hayes
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Philip J. Brehm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5333 - 2005-03-31

Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14047 - 2005-03-31

Darrent Britt v. Jane Gamble
: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4896 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patricia S. Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
. Frazin's wife; (4) whether Magyar's attorney engaged in improper closing argument; (5) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8880 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Lee Terrence Presley
on the briefs of Richard D. Martin, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24830 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edward Garrett
and Curley, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3307 - 2017-09-19

2011 WI APP 49
. Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60745 - 2011-04-19

[PDF] Whistle B. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. LaRocque, Reserve Judge Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20599 - 2017-09-21

State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). The trial court’s determination of what the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31