Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14851 - 14860 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 14851 - 14860 of 84312 for case number.
State v. Michael E. Stumps
ineffective assistance in several respects and that the real controversy in his case was not fully tried. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19406 - 2005-08-24
ineffective assistance in several respects and that the real controversy in his case was not fully tried. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19406 - 2005-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
and the suspect appeared to enter some numbers. The suspect gestured as though he was going to return the phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112660 - 2006-10-16
and the suspect appeared to enter some numbers. The suspect gestured as though he was going to return the phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112660 - 2006-10-16
2007 WI 18
matters pending before any court or administrative agency, together with the case number of each matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28066 - 2007-02-06
matters pending before any court or administrative agency, together with the case number of each matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28066 - 2007-02-06
[PDF]
WI 18
matters pending before any court or administrative agency, together with the case number of each matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28066 - 2014-09-15
matters pending before any court or administrative agency, together with the case number of each matter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28066 - 2014-09-15
John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
recovered or the lodestar method of a reasonable hourly rate multiplied by a reasonable number of hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2873 - 2005-03-31
recovered or the lodestar method of a reasonable hourly rate multiplied by a reasonable number of hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harold Richard Nero
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2001-02). 2 All of Nero’s cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7579 - 2017-09-19
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2001-02). 2 All of Nero’s cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeal in Janiak’s case. In the first, we reversed an order denying Janiak’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54895 - 2014-09-15
appeal in Janiak’s case. In the first, we reversed an order denying Janiak’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9777 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9777 - 2017-09-19
La Crosse Queen, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9777 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347361 - 2021-03-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347361 - 2021-03-24