Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14851 - 14860 of 29817 for des.

[PDF] WI App 134
124 (1996) (statutory interpretation presents a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38860 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
on a question of law is de novo. See State ex rel. Bilder v. Township of Delavan, 112 Wis. 2d 539, 549, 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15369 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the applicable legal standards to be sound, and we essentially adopt it as our own after our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788867 - 2024-04-12

[PDF] WI APP 69
for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95922 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶26 We review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473979 - 2022-01-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535327 - 2022-06-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact for our de novo review. See State v. Stutesman, 221 Wis. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132817 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI App 265
law to a set of facts presents questions of law, which we review de novo. Brown v. State, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30761 - 2007-12-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is whether they are in privity. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Pasko, 252 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135365 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of Elkhorn v. The 211 Centralia Street Corporation
judgment determinations de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Roebke v. Newell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6736 - 2017-09-20