Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 97638 for court records search online.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 97638 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 26, 2017 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182831 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 26, 2017 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 6, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353207 - 2021-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 6, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353207 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The supreme court explained that “nothing in the record [indicated] that [the property owner’s] operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235464 - 2019-02-21
. The supreme court explained that “nothing in the record [indicated] that [the property owner’s] operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235464 - 2019-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court appropriately considered on the record all six factors under WIS. STAT. § 48.426(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
that the circuit court appropriately considered on the record all six factors under WIS. STAT. § 48.426(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court could therefore determine from the record and the briefing alone whether Risch was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619378 - 2023-02-07
. The court could therefore determine from the record and the briefing alone whether Risch was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619378 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the [sentencing] court.” See Norton, 248 Wis. 2d 162, ¶9. Nothing in the record provides a basis for us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696573 - 2023-08-29
by the [sentencing] court.” See Norton, 248 Wis. 2d 162, ¶9. Nothing in the record provides a basis for us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696573 - 2023-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will independently review the record to determine whether there is “any reasonable basis” for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330666 - 2021-02-02
will independently review the record to determine whether there is “any reasonable basis” for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330666 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court’s factual underpinnings were and are supported by the record. In full understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142910 - 2017-09-21
. The court’s factual underpinnings were and are supported by the record. In full understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court record with a unified understanding of the standard of dangerousness at issue. ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798395 - 2024-05-07
a circuit court record with a unified understanding of the standard of dangerousness at issue. ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798395 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At the continued hearing five days later, the circuit court summarized on the record a stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
At the continued hearing five days later, the circuit court summarized on the record a stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21