Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 59372 for quit claim deed.

State v. Timothy A. Powell
denying postconviction relief. Powell claims his sentence should be “restructured.” Powell also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21498 - 2006-02-21

John Louis Castellani v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (WILMIC)
. and Mary Ann Tomczak (the Tomczaks), appeals from a judgment dismissing an attorney malpractice claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15779 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Louis Castellani v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (WILMIC)
a No. 99-1939 2 judgment dismissing an attorney malpractice claim against Michael F. Dubis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15779 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion without a hearing if the defendant’s claim is procedurally barred. See State v. Romero
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717850 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] NOTICE
forfeited his right to direct appellate review of his Sixth Amendment claim because he failed to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Robert Bowen v. Dane County Farmers' Market, Inc.
of and opposing the motion, the court treated the matter as a summary judgment and dismissed all claims. Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9155 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment dismissing their medical malpractice claims against Dr. Paul Boeder. After a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37596 - 2009-07-14

COURT OF APPEALS
action had been filed.[2] The court rejected Ronald’s claim that he transferred the vehicle to Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2013-06-25

COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint seeking judicial review of a Labor and Industry Review Commission decision. Claiming that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47070 - 2010-02-16

Donald Larsen v. Marlene Nehls
claims that because of the small size of the disputed property “the encroachment [was] so benign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15300 - 2005-03-31