Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Jennie E. Stelter v. Green Lantern Restaurant, Inc.
). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2804 - 2017-09-19
). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2804 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219283 - 2018-09-18
of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219283 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, and he has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081430 - 2026-02-25
a response, and he has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081430 - 2026-02-25
Jackie Franklin v. Michael Jackson
, there is no evidence that Diesel Training knew about Jackson's criminal record. Franklin contends that Diesel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8260 - 2005-03-31
, there is no evidence that Diesel Training knew about Jackson's criminal record. Franklin contends that Diesel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8260 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11585 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11585 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricky A. Ducommun
basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process of reasoning applying proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10177 - 2005-03-31
basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process of reasoning applying proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10177 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Charles Garven
not record the interview and his report is not verbatim except to the extent indicated by quotations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11722 - 2017-09-20
not record the interview and his report is not verbatim except to the extent indicated by quotations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11722 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
Steven Mannigel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
in the record. “Substantial evidence” does not mean the preponderance of the evidence. Rather the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6746 - 2005-03-31
in the record. “Substantial evidence” does not mean the preponderance of the evidence. Rather the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6746 - 2005-03-31