Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 84377 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 84377 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239899 - 2019-05-01
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239899 - 2019-05-01
[PDF]
Village of McFarland v. Dennis L. Preston
to the United States Constitution does not prohibit such an expansion of the investigation in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11275 - 2017-09-19
to the United States Constitution does not prohibit such an expansion of the investigation in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11275 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey L. Triggs
, Triggs consented to a search of his person, which resulted in the seizure of cocaine. Triggs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12665 - 2005-03-31
, Triggs consented to a search of his person, which resulted in the seizure of cocaine. Triggs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to sustain the jury’s verdict; we do not search for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61684 - 2014-09-15
to sustain the jury’s verdict; we do not search for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61684 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to sustain the jury’s verdict; we do not search for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61684 - 2011-03-29
to sustain the jury’s verdict; we do not search for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61684 - 2011-03-29
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dean T. Schaefer
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7596 - 2017-09-19
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7596 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the search. When Rezmer began to pat-down Hadley’s ankles, Hadley became “upset” and left the store
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178223 - 2017-09-21
the search. When Rezmer began to pat-down Hadley’s ankles, Hadley became “upset” and left the store
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178223 - 2017-09-21
State v. David L. Gray
of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures;[2] (2) his trial counsel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures;[2] (2) his trial counsel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14