Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14881 - 14890 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Search results 14881 - 14890 of 58338 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. ¶2 Evans was convicted following a jury trial for the first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106336 - 2014-01-06
an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. ¶2 Evans was convicted following a jury trial for the first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106336 - 2014-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
indication that Brent was incapable of understanding standard conversation. ¶5 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32636 - 2008-05-05
indication that Brent was incapable of understanding standard conversation. ¶5 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32636 - 2008-05-05
State v. Odell Williams
was first handled by Assistant District Attorney Shelly Rusch. Before trial, a special prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9669 - 2005-03-31
was first handled by Assistant District Attorney Shelly Rusch. Before trial, a special prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher C. Johnson
) the sentence imposed is unduly harsh and excessive. Because the trial court’s sentence does not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5786 - 2017-09-19
) the sentence imposed is unduly harsh and excessive. Because the trial court’s sentence does not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5786 - 2017-09-19
Steven R. Passehl v. Jay Zeinert
awarding Steven Passehl $5,895.53 in contract damages.[1] Zeinert argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7603 - 2005-03-31
awarding Steven Passehl $5,895.53 in contract damages.[1] Zeinert argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1 The Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas presided at the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31766 - 2014-09-15
. 1 The Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas presided at the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31766 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sky B. Busk
a bank robbery. Busk also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
a bank robbery. Busk also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
[PDF]
State v. Rick E. Norem
modification is justified. At sentencing, the trial court explicitly indicated that it was sentencing Norem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
modification is justified. At sentencing, the trial court explicitly indicated that it was sentencing Norem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
The Estate of Rita Engebose v. Moraine Ridge Limited Partnership
previously filed wrongful death claim.[1] Moraine Ridge contends that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14666 - 2005-03-31
previously filed wrongful death claim.[1] Moraine Ridge contends that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Quinn Johnson
that the trial court erred by: (1) permitting the introduction of evidence demonstrating Johnson's sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8342 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by: (1) permitting the introduction of evidence demonstrating Johnson's sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8342 - 2017-09-19