Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 29763 for des.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 29763 for des.
Lafayette County Human Services v. Gary A.S.
of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2340 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2340 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI App 87
judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315‑17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36524 - 2009-06-29
judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315‑17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36524 - 2009-06-29
State v. Arnold R. Warrichaiet
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 177. The State must show, beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7366 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 177. The State must show, beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 180
review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34605 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191156 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact for our de novo review. See State v. Stutesman, 221 Wis. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132817 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact for our de novo review. See State v. Stutesman, 221 Wis. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 46
review under § 5.06, the court “may not conduct a de novo proceeding with respect to any findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832284 - 2024-09-11
review under § 5.06, the court “may not conduct a de novo proceeding with respect to any findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832284 - 2024-09-11
[PDF]
U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
, as it survives Nankin, but also related statutes. Our review is de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6279 - 2017-09-19
, as it survives Nankin, but also related statutes. Our review is de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sentry Insurance v. Rodney M. Davis
exercised its discretion in excluding the document. If it did, we would consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2998 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion in excluding the document. If it did, we would consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2998 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 187
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26280 - 2014-09-15
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26280 - 2014-09-15