Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 24510 for extending.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 24510 for extending.
State v. Scott A. Abbott
omitted). In Riley, we extended the rationale of Beets to conditions of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11122 - 2005-03-31
omitted). In Riley, we extended the rationale of Beets to conditions of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11122 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to extend criminal liability to an accomplice or co‑conspirator for participating in a substantive crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32112 - 2008-03-17
to extend criminal liability to an accomplice or co‑conspirator for participating in a substantive crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32112 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
Nicholson to one year of initial confinement and one year of extended supervision. At the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103409 - 2013-10-28
Nicholson to one year of initial confinement and one year of extended supervision. At the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103409 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Kaufman
that he would reoffend and therefore the extended parole eligibility date is not necessary to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19
that he would reoffend and therefore the extended parole eligibility date is not necessary to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630408 - 2023-03-07
of initial confinement followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630408 - 2023-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
to thirty years, consisting of twenty-one years of initial confinement, followed by nine years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
to thirty years, consisting of twenty-one years of initial confinement, followed by nine years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Johnson to serve ten years’ initial confinement plus five years’ extended supervision. This no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21
Johnson to serve ten years’ initial confinement plus five years’ extended supervision. This no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court sentenced him to eight years’ initial confinement (IC) plus nine years’ extended supervision (ES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225656 - 2018-11-07
. The court sentenced him to eight years’ initial confinement (IC) plus nine years’ extended supervision (ES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225656 - 2018-11-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
should extend a “certain amount of latitude or understanding for the layman acting in pro-se status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29679 - 2014-09-15
should extend a “certain amount of latitude or understanding for the layman acting in pro-se status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29679 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to sixteen years’ initial confinement and sixteen years’ extended supervision for first-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
to sixteen years’ initial confinement and sixteen years’ extended supervision for first-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06