Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 63998 for judgment for ms.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 63998 for judgment for ms.
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
. APPEAL from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. KREMERS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9011 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. KREMERS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9011 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Lincoln County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30079 - 2007-08-27
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Lincoln County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30079 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: FAYE M. FLANCHER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87124 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: FAYE M. FLANCHER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87124 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of burglary, theft of a firearm and possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94098 - 2014-09-15
a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of burglary, theft of a firearm and possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94098 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 118
granted summary judgment to the City, which argued that the fee is an authorized penalty imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123857 - 2017-09-21
granted summary judgment to the City, which argued that the fee is an authorized penalty imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 could be raised on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the amended judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593015 - 2022-11-22
-CRNM 2 could be raised on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the amended judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593015 - 2022-11-22
State v. James J. Krispin
. Krispin, III, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4293 - 2005-03-31
. Krispin, III, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4293 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Door County: PHILIP M. KIRK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Door County: PHILIP M. KIRK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that added research.” Gorectke did not appeal the divorce court’s final judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100648 - 2026-04-08
that added research.” Gorectke did not appeal the divorce court’s final judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1100648 - 2026-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEALS from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49226 - 2010-04-21
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEALS from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49226 - 2010-04-21