Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1491 - 1500 of 17421 for Cost.

City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
of Milwaukee $5000 plus costs as recovery for the cost of razing his property. Reischel argues that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Raymond Bier v. Mike Wicks
in part and remand for a trial. We also deny Wicks's and Bier's motions for fees and costs under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10299 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
of this order, Daniel W. Morse shall pay to the Office of Lawyer Regulation costs of this proceeding, which
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355461 - 2021-04-08

Jeanne G. Frawley v. Edward L. Frawley
and other housing costs from his total income to reach his true gross income for the period after July 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6911 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lemont Gregory v. United Parcel Service
County Circuit Court to recover $240.00, the alleged cost of ceramics damaged when shipped to a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14670 - 2017-09-21

Quality Investments, Inc. v. Board of Review of the City of Superior
value; (2) the city assessor used the wrong cost approach in making his assessment; and (3) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4581 - 2005-03-31

Raymond Bier v. Mike Wicks
and remand for a trial. We also deny Wicks's and Bier's motions for fees and costs under § 809.25(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10299 - 2005-03-31

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Kevin C. O'Keefe
of the client to pay the costs incurred in pursuing the client's action. As this is the first time he has been
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16370 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court denied this request and awarded additional attorney’s fees and costs to VVC. On appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240674 - 2019-05-15

[PDF] WI App 146
]tate incurred a cost for DNA in this case where there was no prior DNA taken or submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72346 - 2014-09-15