Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1491 - 1500 of 30177 for de.
Search results 1491 - 1500 of 30177 for de.
Patricia Flowers v. Howard A. Newton
to summary judgment. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11805 - 2005-03-31
to summary judgment. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11805 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harrison Franklin
be questioned presents a question of law for our de novo review. See id. After reviewing the memorandum, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12262 - 2005-03-31
be questioned presents a question of law for our de novo review. See id. After reviewing the memorandum, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Terence J. Bilgo v. Don Reineking
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6479 - 2017-09-19
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6479 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Gustafson v. Physicians Ins. Co., 223 Wis. 2d 164
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95741 - 2013-04-17
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Gustafson v. Physicians Ins. Co., 223 Wis. 2d 164
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95741 - 2013-04-17
Terence J. Bilgo v. Don Reineking
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6479 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6479 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. Weborg v. Jenny, 2012 WI 67, ¶43, 341 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. Weborg v. Jenny, 2012 WI 67, ¶43, 341 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
Donald moved to modify child support. A court commissioner denied the motion, and Donald sought de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132238 - 2014-12-29
Donald moved to modify child support. A court commissioner denied the motion, and Donald sought de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132238 - 2014-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
a question of law which we review de novo.” See State ex rel. Brooks v. Hartland Sportsman’s Club, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13171 - 2017-09-21
a question of law which we review de novo.” See State ex rel. Brooks v. Hartland Sportsman’s Club, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13171 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles E. Flynn v. Arctic Express
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. Before Dykman, P.J., Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15985 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. Before Dykman, P.J., Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15985 - 2017-09-21