Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1491 - 1500 of 29290 for er.
Search results 1491 - 1500 of 29290 for er.
COURT OF APPEALS
ability to decide whether to drive. ¶9 Hunt next argues that the circuit court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14
ability to decide whether to drive. ¶9 Hunt next argues that the circuit court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14
CA Blank Order
argued that the circuit court erred by denying Freeman’s motion to withdraw his plea in this case while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105120 - 2013-12-01
argued that the circuit court erred by denying Freeman’s motion to withdraw his plea in this case while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105120 - 2013-12-01
Leon Irby v. Jon E. Litscher
a claim. Irby now appeals pro se. ¶5 Irby argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5769 - 2005-03-31
a claim. Irby now appeals pro se. ¶5 Irby argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5769 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio L. Ford
erred by denying his motion without explanation, and that we should therefore review the motion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2936 - 2017-09-19
erred by denying his motion without explanation, and that we should therefore review the motion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2936 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
] Cody argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it allowed the State to use video-taped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59395 - 2011-01-26
] Cody argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it allowed the State to use video-taped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59395 - 2011-01-26
[PDF]
Frontsheet
and an appeal. The Arizona Supreme Court found these acts violated ERs 1.3 1 (diligence) and 8.4(d) 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167924 - 2017-09-21
and an appeal. The Arizona Supreme Court found these acts violated ERs 1.3 1 (diligence) and 8.4(d) 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167924 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the Commission erred when it made this determination because its factual findings were based on speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42500 - 2014-09-15
that the Commission erred when it made this determination because its factual findings were based on speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision dismissing No. CCI-2023-14306, states a claim that the DOC erred by dismissing No. CCI-2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
decision dismissing No. CCI-2023-14306, states a claim that the DOC erred by dismissing No. CCI-2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
State v. Eric R. George
court erred when it prevented him from offering certain testimony, and when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4497 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it prevented him from offering certain testimony, and when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4497 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marvin Jost
Jost argues that (1) double jeopardy bars retrial; and (2) the trial court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6487 - 2017-09-19
Jost argues that (1) double jeopardy bars retrial; and (2) the trial court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6487 - 2017-09-19