Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14901 - 14910 of 68502 for did.
Search results 14901 - 14910 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Mark E. Hanson
denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop. He contends police did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25726 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a traffic stop. He contends police did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Facundo
conclude that it did not affect the result of this case, because the cocaine was taken after the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
conclude that it did not affect the result of this case, because the cocaine was taken after the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
] The circuit court did not fully explain the elements of the offense during the plea colloquy. However, during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119177 - 2014-08-11
] The circuit court did not fully explain the elements of the offense during the plea colloquy. However, during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119177 - 2014-08-11
[PDF]
Todd W. Dummer v. Mary Lynn Dummer
did not constitute a substantial change of circumstances. The court therefore did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6960 - 2017-09-20
did not constitute a substantial change of circumstances. The court therefore did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6960 - 2017-09-20
B&W Properties v. Jacqueline Omeziri
and did not file a response brief. This court informed B&W that if it did not file a brief, “[t]he court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4081 - 2005-03-31
and did not file a response brief. This court informed B&W that if it did not file a brief, “[t]he court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4081 - 2005-03-31
Lorenza D. Thompson v. Lennore Biggers Thompson
and Lennore cohabited in Georgia. During this time, it is undisputed that Lennore did not object when Lorenza
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7874 - 2005-03-31
and Lennore cohabited in Georgia. During this time, it is undisputed that Lennore did not object when Lorenza
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7874 - 2005-03-31
Suzanne M. Krimmer v. Daniel R. Krimmer
did not commence her proceeding outside the applicable statute of limitations. As the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9856 - 2005-03-31
did not commence her proceeding outside the applicable statute of limitations. As the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9856 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. War N. Marion
denied as procedurally barred by Escalona. Marion did not appeal from that denial. Marion then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20963 - 2017-09-21
denied as procedurally barred by Escalona. Marion did not appeal from that denial. Marion then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20963 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lance L. Egner
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7160 - 2005-03-31
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7160 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifton L. Watts
that offer and proceeded to trial. It is important to note that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
that offer and proceeded to trial. It is important to note that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31