Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14901 - 14910 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 14901 - 14910 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Donald G. Kester
was not based on reasonable suspicion; (2) the trial court erred by denying him the right to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
was not based on reasonable suspicion; (2) the trial court erred by denying him the right to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Odell Williams
was first handled by Assistant District Attorney Shelly Rusch. Before trial, a special prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9669 - 2005-03-31
was first handled by Assistant District Attorney Shelly Rusch. Before trial, a special prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Larry J. Bauer v. Merlin R. Carothers
trial in the interest of justice. He further claims the trial court made evidentiary errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4803 - 2017-09-20
trial in the interest of justice. He further claims the trial court made evidentiary errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4803 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Elaine C. Socha v. James Socha
Joseph and Elaine Socha's pending divorce proceedings. James claims that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9202 - 2017-09-19
Joseph and Elaine Socha's pending divorce proceedings. James claims that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9202 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shirley E.
that the trial court deprived her of her right to an attorney during the dispositional phase of the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21378 - 2006-03-22
that the trial court deprived her of her right to an attorney during the dispositional phase of the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21378 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
it meant to be a party to the crime; (3) trial counsel was ineffective, as demonstrated by a key witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11455 - 2017-09-19
it meant to be a party to the crime; (3) trial counsel was ineffective, as demonstrated by a key witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11455 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
indication that Brent was incapable of understanding standard conversation. ¶5 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32636 - 2008-05-05
indication that Brent was incapable of understanding standard conversation. ¶5 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32636 - 2008-05-05
State v. Sky B. Busk
a bank robbery. Busk also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
a bank robbery. Busk also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1 The Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas presided at the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31766 - 2014-09-15
. 1 The Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas presided at the trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31766 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
Sterken appeals from the trial court’s judgment on the basis of two theories. First, Sterken argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20368 - 2017-09-21
Sterken appeals from the trial court’s judgment on the basis of two theories. First, Sterken argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20368 - 2017-09-21