Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14911 - 14920 of 45537 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Desain Kitchen Set Teak Block Minimalis Aeropolis Tangerang.

State v. Mark Cianciolo
as “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8114 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony T. Blue
. Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law. State v. Michels, 150 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4105 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court set the objection for an evidentiary hearing. ¶5 Prior to the evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139726 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tony P. Gildemeister
warrants sentence modification. Id. ¶8 A new factor is: “a fact or set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25573 - 2006-06-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is: a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230814 - 2018-12-12

COURT OF APPEALS
should be set aside because his trial counsel performed ineffectively during the plea bargaining process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filed his own motion to modify child support, and the circuit court set the matter for trial.2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038405 - 2025-11-19

Laurie Van Cleef v. Mark Van Cleef
. The court set up a schedule of decreasing maintenance payments to be paid to Laurie over thirteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6613 - 2005-03-31

Jacqueline M. L. v. Korey D. S.
motions to set aside the paternity judgment and the arrears. On August 12, 1998, Korey deposited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14782 - 2005-03-31

Norman Meka v. City of Milwaukee Annuity and Pension Board and Robert G. Nehls
letter to the Board that set out his revised decision. We disagree. On review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8939 - 2005-03-31