Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 68502 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not raise issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60900 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
officer. The State did not file a respondent’s brief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736454 - 2023-12-06

O.T. Lupinski v. City of Glendale Community Development Authority
] The issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed the case. We conclude that it did not and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15838 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Fitzgerald Elam
William A. Bablitch and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley would reverse. Justice Jon P. Wilcox did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16909 - 2017-09-21

Todd W. Dummer v. Mary Lynn Dummer
. The trial court, however, refused to accept their stipulation and concluded that Todd’s move did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6960 - 2005-03-31

Robert J. Vanden Heuvel v. Little Chute Area School District
' educational needs; and (2) real estate development and financial profit did not furnish a persuasive basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9097 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Scott has never alleged that he did not reside with A.F.W. Scott pled no contest to one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182073 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lance L. Egner
and fact using the Blockburger test, there is a presumption that the legislature did not intend multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7158 - 2005-03-31

H. James Oberg v. Donald W. Helgesen
a new contract to which the parties did not agree. See Meyer v. Norgaard, 160 Wis.2d 794, 802, 467 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9005 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the assessment and the application of the statute of limitations. We conclude, as did the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51337 - 2010-06-29