Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 75220 for public records.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 75220 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Ray A. Hampton
the videotape from the in-store camera, which had recorded the robbery. Norman testified for the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11484 - 2017-09-19
the videotape from the in-store camera, which had recorded the robbery. Norman testified for the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11484 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312467 - 2020-12-10
report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312467 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius F.
of the public during the extension proceedings. Therefore, there was a due process violation, the prior CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5916 - 2017-09-19
of the public during the extension proceedings. Therefore, there was a due process violation, the prior CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5916 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eddie J. Shumaker
, 362 N.W.2d 179, 182 (Ct. App. 1984). It is clear from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8575 - 2005-03-31
, 362 N.W.2d 179, 182 (Ct. App. 1984). It is clear from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8575 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Highshaw’s electronically recorded phone calls. This part of the motion was not decided in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
of Highshaw’s electronically recorded phone calls. This part of the motion was not decided in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16
CA Blank Order
Brown County Courthouse P.O. Box 23600 Green Bay, WI 54305-3600 Donna L. Hintze Asst. State Public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119172 - 2014-08-11
Brown County Courthouse P.O. Box 23600 Green Bay, WI 54305-3600 Donna L. Hintze Asst. State Public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119172 - 2014-08-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2012AP1027-CRNM 2 the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95390 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP1027-CRNM 2 the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95390 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andrea J. Ogden
apology, perform 50 hours of community service, reimburse the public defender's office for attorney's fees
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16915 - 2005-03-31
apology, perform 50 hours of community service, reimburse the public defender's office for attorney's fees
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius F.
of the public during the extension proceedings. Therefore, there was a due process violation, the prior CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5914 - 2017-09-19
of the public during the extension proceedings. Therefore, there was a due process violation, the prior CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5914 - 2017-09-19