Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 47113 for shows.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 47113 for shows.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Santiago must show both: (1) that his counsel’s representation was deficient; and (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245315 - 2019-08-20
, Santiago must show both: (1) that his counsel’s representation was deficient; and (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245315 - 2019-08-20
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
against compelled self-incrimination require that it make two showings. First, the State must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
against compelled self-incrimination require that it make two showings. First, the State must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
absent a showing of a sufficient reason for the omission. ¶16 Anderson asserts that his learning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91964 - 2014-09-15
absent a showing of a sufficient reason for the omission. ¶16 Anderson asserts that his learning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91964 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the familiar two-pronged test: the defendant must show that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289815 - 2020-09-22
the familiar two-pronged test: the defendant must show that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289815 - 2020-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
In order to establish a retaliation claim, the employee must first make a prima facie showing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70626 - 2011-10-04
In order to establish a retaliation claim, the employee must first make a prima facie showing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70626 - 2011-10-04
State v. Raymond W. Lyght
then bears the burden of showing constitutionality by a preponderance of the evidence. State v. Noble, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17837 - 2005-05-02
then bears the burden of showing constitutionality by a preponderance of the evidence. State v. Noble, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17837 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
Pamela Ketelle v. Wausau-Stettin Mutual Insurance Company
of the home, and Shannon showed Holster two loaded firearms. At some point Holster had the firearms in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6709 - 2017-09-20
of the home, and Shannon showed Holster two loaded firearms. At some point Holster had the firearms in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6709 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2016AP856-CR 8 defendant seeking to withdraw a plea before sentencing bears the burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195019 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2016AP856-CR 8 defendant seeking to withdraw a plea before sentencing bears the burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195019 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
that it make two showings. First, the State must prove that the accused was adequately informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
that it make two showings. First, the State must prove that the accused was adequately informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12705 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 668, 687 (1984). To prove deficient performance, the defendant must show that counsel’s actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
. 668, 687 (1984). To prove deficient performance, the defendant must show that counsel’s actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03