Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 58542 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
could pursue an arguably meritorious challenge to his trial counsel’s performance concerning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106928 - 2014-01-14
could pursue an arguably meritorious challenge to his trial counsel’s performance concerning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106928 - 2014-01-14
County of Ashland v. John J. Jaakkola
obligation to take a test for intoxication; and (6) whether the trial court erred by not admitting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9065 - 2005-03-31
obligation to take a test for intoxication; and (6) whether the trial court erred by not admitting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Holden
his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and prosecutorial misconduct. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19
his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and prosecutorial misconduct. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
of the crime; (2) Gauerke did not understand what it meant to be a party to the crime; (3) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
of the crime; (2) Gauerke did not understand what it meant to be a party to the crime; (3) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
State v. Odell Williams
was first handled by Assistant District Attorney Shelly Rusch. Before trial, a special prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9669 - 2005-03-31
was first handled by Assistant District Attorney Shelly Rusch. Before trial, a special prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9669 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher C. Johnson
and excessive. Because the trial court’s sentence does not violate Johnson’s constitutional rights and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5786 - 2005-03-31
and excessive. Because the trial court’s sentence does not violate Johnson’s constitutional rights and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5786 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
)(a) and (b), Stats. Burch argues that the trial court erred by finding that Burch, when encountered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and (b), Stats. Burch argues that the trial court erred by finding that Burch, when encountered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sky B. Busk
a bank robbery. Busk also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
a bank robbery. Busk also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25036 - 2006-05-03
State v. Donald G. Kester
was not based on reasonable suspicion; (2) the trial court erred by denying him the right to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
was not based on reasonable suspicion; (2) the trial court erred by denying him the right to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Estate of Rita Engebose v. Moraine Ridge Limited Partnership
wrongful death claim.1 Moraine Ridge contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14666 - 2017-09-21
wrongful death claim.1 Moraine Ridge contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14666 - 2017-09-21