Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 58340 for speedy trial.

[PDF] WI 61
that his two trial counsel were ineffective for permitting him to withdraw his NGI pleas inasmuch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99195 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey Lorenzo Searcy
counts of burglary. We uphold the trial court’s finding that Searcy failed to satisfy his burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20717 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Lorenzo Searcy
on both counts of burglary. We uphold the trial court’s finding that Searcy failed to satisfy his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20717 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bennie L. Harvey
appeals from a judgment convicting him of armed robbery and battery. He contends that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13275 - 2005-03-31

State v. Wayne M. Fredrich
an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea based on ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7310 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ginger L. Leblanc v. Secura Insurance
suffered by his wife, Ginger.1 Secura argues that the evidence does not support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10966 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
motion requesting a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109188 - 2014-03-18

Tina Toborg and Bronson Toborg and Morgan Toborg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
insurer. Toborg sued for injuries suffered in an automobile accident involving Utterback. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15930 - 2005-03-31

County of Taylor v. Dustin David Hamland
. Hamland filed a motion to dismiss on the day of his jury trial. The trial court interpreted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14121 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Donald Minniecheske v. Village of Tigerton
to the Village of Tigerton in the amount of $563.80. On appeal, the issues are whether the trial judge erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9897 - 2017-09-19