Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 58345 for us.

Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Elections Board
decision in the case. In our order scheduling the argument, we directed the parties to provide us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16051 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in this section indicating that the school district must require Jaa’la to use this provided “service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68667 - 2011-07-27

[PDF] State v. Raymond L. Matzker
as to what constitutes "acts of sexual violence" as used in the definition of "mental disorder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10096 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of sixteen (use or threat of force or violence and as an actor over the age of eighteen) (Count 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696573 - 2023-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
of law and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40851 - 2009-09-14

Monroe Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Harlan H.
if the trial court applies the correct legal standard to the relevant facts, and using a rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2452 - 2005-03-31

State v. John S. Cooper
. The California statute is sufficiently similar to ours to allow us to consider the California court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5587 - 2005-03-31

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
the plaintiff had allowed one of his colleagues to use his Oak Creek address so the colleague's child could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 24
a modification. He would have us conclude that the provision at issue in this case is merely a stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27899 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph D. Haas
vehicle. The court found that the use of the tracking device fell within that allowed by the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31