Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14921 - 14930 of 72851 for we.

[PDF] State v. Terrence Miller
ordered him to spit out the object in his mouth. Because we conclude that the officers did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14785 - 2017-09-21

Gary L. Retzlaff v. Betty A. Winters
award. We agree. She also argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jason W. Wright
intentional homicide and aggravated battery convictions. We apply federal case law in deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8269 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] 89-CV-231 v. Oneida County
of such a classification, however, does not render this statute a private bill. The Brookfield criteria require we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11810 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no misrepresentation. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017415 - 2025-10-01

County of Rock v. Gibson T. Gilmore
established in Wis. Stat. ch. 227, and therefore the approval was invalid. We have rejected the identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6573 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Patricia A. Vrieze v. John H. Vrieze
, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987). We apply the same methodology as the trial court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13115 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and reached a decision not rationally based upon the evidence presented at the waiver hearing. We find ample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26894 - 2006-10-24

Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
this case and also erred in finding the claim to be frivolous. We hold that dismissal was proper because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16313 - 2005-03-31

89-CV-231 v. Oneida County
a private bill. The Brookfield criteria require we examine the classification set forth in the bill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11810 - 2005-03-31