Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14931 - 14940 of 60761 for affidavit of service form.
Search results 14931 - 14940 of 60761 for affidavit of service form.
COURT OF APPEALS
was provided ineffective assistance of counsel by Flanagan.[2] Brush’s affidavit in support of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12
was provided ineffective assistance of counsel by Flanagan.[2] Brush’s affidavit in support of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing, concluding that Latorre had “failed to provide any supporting affidavit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101361 - 2013-08-26
without a hearing, concluding that Latorre had “failed to provide any supporting affidavit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101361 - 2013-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and intentionally omitted and misrepresented facts in the affidavit supporting the application for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134389 - 2015-02-10
and intentionally omitted and misrepresented facts in the affidavit supporting the application for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134389 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
points to the following evidence. First, he points to a portion of his affidavit for the proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204745 - 2017-12-07
points to the following evidence. First, he points to a portion of his affidavit for the proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204745 - 2017-12-07
Fredrick v. Kaerek Builders, Inc.
, the Williamses’ complaint and affidavits filed in opposition to summary judgment raise the following allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11295 - 2005-03-31
, the Williamses’ complaint and affidavits filed in opposition to summary judgment raise the following allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11295 - 2005-03-31
Albert A. Tadych v. Waukesha County
, 1999, was supported only by an affidavit from Attorney Tadych which concluded that summary judgment had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15165 - 2005-03-31
, 1999, was supported only by an affidavit from Attorney Tadych which concluded that summary judgment had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15165 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the affidavit supporting the application for a search warrant for Wolske’s residence. ¶3 Wolske’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134389 - 2017-09-21
in the affidavit supporting the application for a search warrant for Wolske’s residence. ¶3 Wolske’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw his pleas because of newly discovered evidence. Gordon attaches to his response an affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263655 - 2020-06-09
to withdraw his pleas because of newly discovered evidence. Gordon attaches to his response an affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263655 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion without a hearing, concluding that Latorre had “failed to provide any supporting affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101361 - 2017-09-21
motion without a hearing, concluding that Latorre had “failed to provide any supporting affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony would have contradicted officers’ testimony, “[n]o affidavit from Honeycutt exists to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
testimony would have contradicted officers’ testimony, “[n]o affidavit from Honeycutt exists to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21