Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14931 - 14940 of 30172 for de.
Search results 14931 - 14940 of 30172 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal. Standards of Review ¶18 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30403 - 2007-09-26
appeal. Standards of Review ¶18 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30403 - 2007-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257974 - 2020-04-16
judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257974 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
Denis Collins v. Andrew Policano
. 227. Thus, the question before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15063 - 2017-09-21
. 227. Thus, the question before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 34
that we review de novo. “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78515 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78515 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven F. Weynand v. Lucille R. Weynand Foster
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15375 - 2017-09-21
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. See id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
they are clearly erroneous. See id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
State v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.
De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4546 - 2005-03-31
De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by police; and those made after 8:12 p.m. “by de facto police proxies and/or resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14
by police; and those made after 8:12 p.m. “by de facto police proxies and/or resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14
[PDF]
Michael Jackson v. James DeWitt
is de novo, applying the same summary judgment methodology of § 802.08, STATS. See Millers Nat’l Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13652 - 2017-09-21
is de novo, applying the same summary judgment methodology of § 802.08, STATS. See Millers Nat’l Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13652 - 2017-09-21