Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14941 - 14950 of 63933 for records/1000.
Search results 14941 - 14950 of 63933 for records/1000.
State v. Ricky A. Ducommun
basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process of reasoning applying proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10177 - 2005-03-31
basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process of reasoning applying proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10177 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the recording from this hearing and the agreement as stated on the record. There was nothing in the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58067 - 2010-12-20
the recording from this hearing and the agreement as stated on the record. There was nothing in the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58067 - 2010-12-20
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122104 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Charles Garven
not record the interview and his report is not verbatim except to the extent indicated by quotations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11722 - 2017-09-20
not record the interview and his report is not verbatim except to the extent indicated by quotations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11722 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503822 - 2022-04-06
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503822 - 2022-04-06
Steven Mannigel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
in the record. “Substantial evidence” does not mean the preponderance of the evidence. Rather the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6746 - 2005-03-31
in the record. “Substantial evidence” does not mean the preponderance of the evidence. Rather the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the record, the no- merit report, and Brown’s responses as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
reviewed the record, the no- merit report, and Brown’s responses as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” are security deposits as well, regardless of the amount. The record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246632 - 2019-09-12
” are security deposits as well, regardless of the amount. The record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246632 - 2019-09-12
[PDF]
Megan Mason v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
of the evidence. ¶5 The hospital further maintains there is no evidence in the record that any substandard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5704 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence. ¶5 The hospital further maintains there is no evidence in the record that any substandard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5704 - 2017-09-19