Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14951 - 14960 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 14951 - 14960 of 25817 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Jerrit L. Brown
postconviction considerations constituted new factors warranting sentence modification. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25087 - 2006-05-08
postconviction considerations constituted new factors warranting sentence modification. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25087 - 2006-05-08
State v. Michael A. DeLain
arguments mandates a new trial; and (4) a new trial is warranted because the real controversy has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6469 - 2005-03-31
arguments mandates a new trial; and (4) a new trial is warranted because the real controversy has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6469 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
guilty pleas warranted allowing her an opportunity for release to extended supervision. To that end
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525586 - 2022-06-01
guilty pleas warranted allowing her an opportunity for release to extended supervision. To that end
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525586 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
already concluded that Luster’s testimony does not warrant reversal, we similarly conclude that it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6950 - 2017-09-20
already concluded that Luster’s testimony does not warrant reversal, we similarly conclude that it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6950 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that warrant a reasonable belief that criminal activity is afoot.” Id., ¶21. A mere hunch that criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21
that warrant a reasonable belief that criminal activity is afoot.” Id., ¶21. A mere hunch that criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was conclusory and insufficient to warrant a hearing. ¶10 This appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255522 - 2020-03-03
was conclusory and insufficient to warrant a hearing. ¶10 This appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255522 - 2020-03-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not constitute a “new factor” warranting further sentencing proceedings. ¶17 Leiser also asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98604 - 2014-09-15
not constitute a “new factor” warranting further sentencing proceedings. ¶17 Leiser also asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
draw pursuant to a search warrant. Anderson refused to comply with the warrant and provide a sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667050 - 2023-06-13
draw pursuant to a search warrant. Anderson refused to comply with the warrant and provide a sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667050 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his or her safety and that of others was in danger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197175 - 2017-10-03
in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his or her safety and that of others was in danger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197175 - 2017-10-03
[PDF]
WI APP 66
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36295 - 2014-09-15
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36295 - 2014-09-15