Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14951 - 14960 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.

Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we affirm the circuit court’s judgments and order. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2005-03-31

Robin R. Arnoldussen v. Phil Kingston
the record from Arnoldussen’s disciplinary proceedings. The court reviewed the record and affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14906 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ventae Parrow
of retail theft that was read into the record for sentencing purposes. The plea bargain also obligated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kimberly S. Skavlen
, on this record, a violation of equal protection. BACKGROUND The State filed complaints charging Skavlen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12534 - 2017-09-21

Gerald T. Schaetz v. Town of Scott
. Because an assessor’s map was properly created, approved and recorded, the street vacating provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13792 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the record.” The transcript of the Machner hearing, however, is not included in the appellate record. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11

[PDF] State v. John D. Meindl
it was within the trial court’s discretion to admit the testimony as a recorded recollection pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights to Joseph. Jennifer appealed. We reversed and remanded, concluding the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95029 - 2013-04-08

Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
. The first two issues are not properly before us. The appellate record is limited to the proceedings leading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31

Crystal McKee v. Allstate Insurance Company
payment. Although the record is not clear, the parties do not dispute that the date of their verbal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14018 - 2005-03-31