Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14961 - 14970 of 58306 for us.

Monroe Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Harlan H.
if the trial court applies the correct legal standard to the relevant facts, and using a rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2452 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Monroe Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Harlan H.
to the relevant facts, and using a rational process, arrives at a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2453 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a “ruse” that was used as an “investigative tool.” Bender stated that after he left the interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108943 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cheryl P. Baraty v. Lior Baraty
). It is within the trial court’s discretion to determine the appropriate methodology to use to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12006 - 2017-09-21

State v. Pha Vue
ceased. Smith stated that Vue “would not talk to us.” Vue moved for a mistrial claiming that his Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3491 - 2005-03-31

Thomas J. Kuklinski v. Humberto A. Rodriguez, M.D.
and treatment that could be used in the context of Mr. Kuklinski's injury.” Dr. Cicero responded: “I don't
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9467 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph D. Haas
vehicle. The court found that the use of the tracking device fell within that allowed by the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31

State v. John S. Cooper
. The California statute is sufficiently similar to ours to allow us to consider the California court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5587 - 2005-03-31

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
the plaintiff had allowed one of his colleagues to use his Oak Creek address so the colleague's child could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
brief as its decision and asks us to remand the case back to the postconviction court for a more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22