Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. May
in the outcome. See id. However, we need not address the prejudice prong of the test if deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14734 - 2017-09-21
in the outcome. See id. However, we need not address the prejudice prong of the test if deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14734 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert M. May
not address the prejudice prong of the test if deficient performance is not shown. See id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
not address the prejudice prong of the test if deficient performance is not shown. See id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard Austin
a refusal order determining that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7269 - 2017-09-20
a refusal order determining that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7269 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ervin J. Seidl
test results at the time of the offense were twice the legal limit, although the blood alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14654 - 2017-09-21
test results at the time of the offense were twice the legal limit, although the blood alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Comment on Supreme Court Rule petition 09-08
” test applied in determining whether a State Bar expense was made for those purposes, this test
/supreme/docs/0908petitionmemoadd.pdf - 2011-03-30
” test applied in determining whether a State Bar expense was made for those purposes, this test
/supreme/docs/0908petitionmemoadd.pdf - 2011-03-30
[PDF]
Rufus West v. Gary McCaughtry
§ DOC 303.511, and refusing to submit to a No. 96-1665 2 urine test for intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10944 - 2017-09-19
§ DOC 303.511, and refusing to submit to a No. 96-1665 2 urine test for intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10944 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Modory
as unreasonably refusing to submit to a chemical test of his breath, contrary to § 343.305, STATS. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
as unreasonably refusing to submit to a chemical test of his breath, contrary to § 343.305, STATS. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Walter Rieckhoff
-2929-CR 2 blood test. Because the issues Rieckhoff raises in this appeal were decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3201 - 2017-09-19
-2929-CR 2 blood test. Because the issues Rieckhoff raises in this appeal were decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3201 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Mueller
refused to submit to chemical testing. He appeals an order finding his refusal unreasonable. Mueller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8927 - 2017-09-19
refused to submit to chemical testing. He appeals an order finding his refusal unreasonable. Mueller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8927 - 2017-09-19
City of Marinette v. Paul H. Gerondale
, including field tests, reasonable. This court disagrees. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11105 - 2005-03-31
, including field tests, reasonable. This court disagrees. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11105 - 2005-03-31