Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 20860 for word.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 20860 for word.
[PDF]
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope, history, and the object which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope, history, and the object which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
or interpreting a statute the court is not at liberty to disregard the plain, clear words of the statute.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
or interpreting a statute the court is not at liberty to disregard the plain, clear words of the statute.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lana Lanser
volume. Q So, in other words, would the alcohol sample ... be inaccurate if that swab was misused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31
volume. Q So, in other words, would the alcohol sample ... be inaccurate if that swab was misused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harris D. Byers
distributively, so that each word is applied to the subject or consequent that most properly relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2273 - 2017-09-19
distributively, so that each word is applied to the subject or consequent that most properly relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2273 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, there was no requirement that the State put on evidence that Johnson’s predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81181 - 2014-09-15
. In other words, there was no requirement that the State put on evidence that Johnson’s predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81181 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a “person,” Bogenschneider has provided us no reason, and we see none, for interpreting the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125300 - 2017-09-21
as a “person,” Bogenschneider has provided us no reason, and we see none, for interpreting the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125300 - 2017-09-21
David J. Carmain v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
. No explanation was provided as to why, despite the fact that the clearly worded summons informed ACC of its legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4604 - 2005-03-31
. No explanation was provided as to why, despite the fact that the clearly worded summons informed ACC of its legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Elmer J. K.
jurisdiction and legal custody ….” This language is ambiguous. It may, by virtue of the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
jurisdiction and legal custody ….” This language is ambiguous. It may, by virtue of the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
words could also be taken to mean that no amount of restitution should be ordered either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
words could also be taken to mean that no amount of restitution should be ordered either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
together in Portage.” I wrote this in my notes. Whether that’s the words or not, I’m not sure. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32290 - 2008-03-31
together in Portage.” I wrote this in my notes. Whether that’s the words or not, I’m not sure. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32290 - 2008-03-31