Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14981 - 14990 of 72859 for we.
Search results 14981 - 14990 of 72859 for we.
2010 WI APP 127
of Natural Resources (DNR) preempts the District’s ordinance. We affirm the circuit court on this ground. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53542 - 2010-09-28
of Natural Resources (DNR) preempts the District’s ordinance. We affirm the circuit court on this ground. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53542 - 2010-09-28
Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
this case and also erred in finding the claim to be frivolous. We hold that dismissal was proper because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16313 - 2005-08-30
this case and also erred in finding the claim to be frivolous. We hold that dismissal was proper because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16313 - 2005-08-30
Patrick F. Shelton v. Thomas Dolan
), and the trial court therefore erred in dismissing that claim. We conclude that our supreme court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14101 - 2005-03-31
), and the trial court therefore erred in dismissing that claim. We conclude that our supreme court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14101 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County v. Darlene R.
were held outside the statutory time limits without a showing of good cause on the record. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9234 - 2007-09-13
were held outside the statutory time limits without a showing of good cause on the record. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9234 - 2007-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS
-finding hearing. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 A petition to terminate Bryant’s parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35018 - 2008-12-29
-finding hearing. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 A petition to terminate Bryant’s parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35018 - 2008-12-29
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
minimum penalty at the time of his pleas. We disagree with both of these assertions and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
minimum penalty at the time of his pleas. We disagree with both of these assertions and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
County of Rock v. Gibson T. Gilmore
established in Wis. Stat. ch. 227, and therefore the approval was invalid. We have rejected the identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6573 - 2005-03-31
established in Wis. Stat. ch. 227, and therefore the approval was invalid. We have rejected the identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6573 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject Tody’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Tody’s jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32512 - 2008-04-21
ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject Tody’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Tody’s jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32512 - 2008-04-21
State v. Rayshun D. Eason
by allowing for the destruction of evidence. ¶2 However, we conclude that the evidence should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17433 - 2005-03-31
by allowing for the destruction of evidence. ¶2 However, we conclude that the evidence should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17433 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying them visitation with the girls, and each raises a number of other individual claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57680 - 2011-01-02
denying them visitation with the girls, and each raises a number of other individual claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57680 - 2011-01-02